Frank

Taking care of and defending your reputation!

Services for Companies

Everything can be lost or almost be gained by a bad or good reputation _esa `general opinion that have on something or somebody, and that it tries to define his function briefly or desempeño'_.

For a person, to have a bad reputation, can mean great problems in its life (work, love, friendship, etc). And for a company, great lost, and difficulties that could cause their closing.

You allow of the importance of maintaining a good reputation, companies that are dedicated to `to take care of the reputation of other companies in Internet'. This is the peculiar service of ReputationHQ, a Web site with all the tools necessary to construct and to maintain a good reputation of the companies or Web sites, in Internet have been created.

Basically its service consists of which the companies that contract (UD$49.95 to it | 32,36 Euros per month), obtain a personal account in their site, to have access to tools that allow to rake by all Internet, the commentaries, articles, messages, discussions, mentions and others `habladurías `, where could be found information negative that it harms his reputation.

A registry of its reputation can be taken, with the direction of the negative commentaries on the company, so that once found it is possible to be tried to defend the reputation of his company in necessary case. Adding commentaries and to follow a certain conversation.

 To improve the presence and Reputation of your company in Internet

Frankly I believe that to pay 50 dollars per month simply to find the Web sites where we speak on ``_lo who easily we could do with a good use of the different gratuitous finders, or with anyone of the tools of gratuitous searches of which already there are hablado_, he is insufficient and unjustifiable. It would have some sense if ReputatioHQ offered a service more `completo' that is to say, than aside from finding the commentaries or detrimental information or difamatoria on a company, are they themselves the ones in charge of `to resist `or `to defend `to his clients. That is in fact a service that could look for companies or industralists who do not have the time necessary to walk looking for and responding to whichever Web site it happens to him to speak badly of them. By that service it would be possible to be paid 32 monthly Euros, but Reason why at the moment it offers ReputationHQ? , it is clear that no.

(To see if now they use his tools of tracking to find this post, and they label as `bad reputation for ellos' and add some clarifying commentary to try to improve:( it).




If you have liked east article, compártelo or vote by in menéamemeneameand fresqui freski
Also you will be able to share it in , by E-M@il or to postear it in your blog, MySpace or Web site, with:

I know FIRST in knowing the last new features in Computer science, Software, Tools and Utilities Web, Servants, Applications, Design Web, Web 2,0, and Much more. Just by to add Our Feed to your Favorite reader.

Also you will be able suscribirte to directly receive our publications in your M@il, to leave us to your commentary filling up the following form, or to make trackback to this entrance from your own blog or page Web.



Category: Curiosities, Tools, Internet, Utilities Webs |
RELATED ARTICLES







7 Commentaries

  1. Jeromy

    We found it! For Thanks the review. You raise to very good point and one we raised ourselves - why pay for something you could easily find with to little elbow grease? That's actually not the point behind the service - the service itself isn't just providing information - it's to social deal network to actually with properly RESPONDING in an organized fashion. Ace opposed to emailing each to other or trying to keep track of sites yourself, they're all gathered in familiar a environment where everyone dog engage, tag and organize the good and bad information than assign all items for others to deal with. Find to good review? Reward to happy to customer. Find to bad one? Offer and apology and to refund or coupon. Found reviews in other languages? Tag them and get them translated. Hope this helps clarify to bit!

  2. Jeromy

    in Spanish:

    We have found! Thanks for the revision. You to raise a very good point and that we have raised we ourself - why to pay by that you can find easily with a little hard work? That in fact it does not put it behind the service - the service in himself it is not only the information provision - is a social network really to approach ANSWER in form suitably organized. Unlike electronic mail an a others or to try to make a pursuit of the sites of same you, are all reunited in a familiar atmosphere where everybody can participate, organize and label good and the bad information that to assign work elements to do against the others. To find a good examination? Reward, a client. It finds one bad one? To offer an excuse and a restitution or of coupon. Found commentaries in other languages? Label they and to make translate them. Hope that helps to clarify a little!

  3. Jeromy

    One dwells notices - your same question could sees asked of basecamp - why pay for money something that could sees accomplished through email? Well, convenience & organization trumps everything else in our opinion - Time is money!

  4. Jeromy

    in Spanish:

    One more a note - of his same question it can ask basic - why to pay money by which it could be obtained through email? Good, comfort and organization triumphs all the others, in our opinion - the time is money!

  5. Frank

    Upsss… `Said and Done. ;)

    They were not more than 24 hours so that ReputationHQ found this revision of its service (what it demonstrates the effectiveness of its tools of tracking).

    After reading the clarifying commentary of Jeromy (in English and Spanish), we it has left clear more that one is a complete system of tracking, organization, community, etc.

    But itself with the idea that the true service for an industralist (who only has the time necessary to concentrate in his company), is to pay so that the professionals of Internet worry about `to resist the commentaries desfavorables' or `to clarify the image of empresa'.
    But good. It is only my opinion! . Which can completely be mistaken, crazy or Brilliant! . Who knows.

    (thanks to Jeromy by its explanation).

    Somebody more has something to say?

  6. Jeromy

    Glad that cleared things up. For We toyed with the idea of helping to remove negative things and we felt education was the best way to do that under we're focusing our blog on becoming to great resource that. Most companies already have to legal marketing department or department to handle these things, they just need help organizing the information and that's where we eats in.

  7. Jeromy

    I cheer of which they cleaned the things. We are toyed with the idea to help to eliminate the negative things and it seemed to us the education is the best way to do the one that what we are centering ours blog in becoming a great resource for it. The majority of the companies or has a marketing department or the legal department to handle these things, that, simply, need to help the organization of the information and from we come pulg there

Something that To say! to /Preguntar?



Your OpenID (optional)

Your Commentary (required)




















Via Feed!Via M@il

Related




In TecnoGizmo.



Statistics



1.358 Articles
1.338 Commentaries
1875 member (s)
964 guest (s)

IN JUNE

104,198 Visitas
210.584 seen Pages






Safe Creative